Throwback Tuesday

2015 has been a crazy busy year, and we have to thank you all for that. Being in need of a small break, we're at about 1/4 throttle this week. Time to recharge and get ready for an even bigger 2016. Looking back through the blog archives, it's funny how consistent we've remained with a lot of things. Today's throwback, from 11/28/11, is a great example of that. Enjoy.

When I was a younger lad, I sold insurance for boats.  It was one of those funny situations where I was really effective at it when I did it the way I naturally did it, which was to go to boat races and marinas and just generally hang out with people and be in the loop, but my place of employ preferred my presence in midtown Manhattan, wearing a suit and tie.  This marked me for two reasons - the first is that it instilled in me a lifelong appreciation that your time is well spent out among the madding crowds (see below).The second was this annoying phrase that I hated called "leaving money on the table."  My boss ALWAYS used it.  "We don't want to be leaving money on the table!"  Yeah, I got it.  I just didn't like it then, and I still don't now.  A big part of the stupidity in it for me then was that it didn't fit my scheme.  Getting paid meant getting a large volume of clients.  Getting a large volume of clients meant spending a lot of time networking and being in the field, and closing deals quickly.  I was doing a lot of sailing then so I wasn't anonymous in the market, and then as now, a lot of customers wanted to do business with me and not my price.  Price would win me some customers, and it would be a high but not top priority for the heart of my audience.  But it wasn't the story, and the incremental few dollars I might have "left on the table" didn't change my commission very much at all.  Whether I got the deal or not was the compensation issue, and it was far easier for me to just do it at the carrier's best quoted price rather than worry about a few extra bones - I figured I was working for my customers, not my boss or the carrier,  and their best interests were mine as well.

I know that there are a lot of people who would cringe and tell me I'm an idiot for this approach.  Apparently some of the work in the bike industry.  The other day I read a review on one of the sites I read because I love to hate it, and the bike being reviewed was referred to as an "x" dollar bike.  Now, I'm at the point where if you tell me that maufacturer, the frame material, the place in the brand's hierarchy the frame occupies (ProTour level, "sport" series, etc), and the primary component spec, I can pretty accurately guess the retail.  Well, price "x" of this bike instantly sounded incongruous to me, so I went to the manufacturer and found that the actual MSRP was 150% of price "x."  Makes perfect sense, right?  When there's enough room in the MSRP for the street price to be 2/3rds of the MSRP, someone's made a pretty daring attempt not to leave any money on the table. 

This all leads the typical consumer to want to seek a better deal.  If situations like that are happening all day every day, and you can get 1/3 off just by doing the most basic amount of digging or asking, you're darn right when you say "I had to ask."

Mike and I, being the crotchety bastards that we are, and having done what we've done in pricing how we have, have often gotten offended by these requests.  To be honest, every single one has caused some degree of "what the hell do people think we have left to cut out" type of banter between us.  We make money on every sale, maybe not a lot, but we're never going to pay you to buy stuff from us (unless we heinously screw something up).  Conversely, we're not concerned about "leaving money on the table."  Our general philosophy on prices is that if our price for something is $485, we're not interested in selling it for $484.98, and we won't.  Both parties in the equation have the right to say "no thanks," and if your offer is below our price, "no thanks" is our answer.  Among the many other things we don't like about "don't leave money on the table" pricing is that negotiating takes time that we haven't got. 

Even with that, we lose when we step onto the field because it's in our nature to artfully craft a diplomatic response to each of these requests to enter negotiation.  And we get A LOT of them.  And that takes A LOT of time, time that we would rather spend doing almost anything, including pulling out our own fingernails with vice-grips.  It sucks for us.  So we've decided not to do it anymore.  We're going form letter.  So from here on, requests of the "I had to ask" variety will be answered (with our usual promptness) with a very boring DREADED FORM LETTER, suitable for framing, explaining simply that the price is the price. 

It seemed kind of anathema to me that we would stoop to the DREADED FORM LETTER, but time is a zero sum game.  If we spend 3 hours a week in wordcraft, making personalized, pithy explanations of why we won't give you a nickel off the price, that's three hours we can't spend on some thing that benefits us and our customers.  In actual fact these requests take time that could otherwise be spent doing more for our customers, so in a pragmatic view of customer service, responding with the DREADED FORM LETTER is actually better customer service. 

When you want to get our best price, you really don't have to ask. 

Back to blog


So what I take from this is two things: First, I think since this article was written you've built trust with your loyal base and they now believe that your price is your best price. That took some time to establish but I think you're there now. Second is human nature. When making a big $$ purchase people are usually on the fence and having that conversation with themselves (and their wife most likely) about justifying making the purchase. And though it's inconsequential, something as simple as throwing in a tchotchke pushes them into the purchase. The human psyche is not rational!So yeah I agree with you that it's a massive time sink and the form letter is the way to go, but hey, people are people and it's more about them convincing themselves than nickel and dime-ing you. Keep up the great work. I'm sold.


We did CX frames that were great but are no longer feasible. TT frames are too specialized. The frame business is harder than ever for a lot of reasons. That's all.


So what happened to the frames? CX and the prototype TT frame in aluminum. Any back stories on that?


Hi Brian, thanks for the comments. We suspect that you are exactly right in your estimation of the situation. The thing is, people are coming at it from the perspective you describe, asking us to sort of loosen our belt a little bit, not realizing that our pants are already on the floor. It's a slightly unusual stands that we have, but we think that it's ultimately far and away the best for the customer, but it of course also leaves us with nothing left to sweeten the pot for people.


Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.